South Korea Responds To Cryptocurrency Petition

February 15, 2018 12:10 AM

A public petition that requested the South Korean authorities chorus from hardline digital foreign money regulation has drawn a response from Hong Nam-ki, minister of the workplace for presidency coverage coordination.

A February 13, 2018 report mentioned that the petition issued to the federal government by South Korean residents, which calls for a keep on a cryptocurrency crackdown, has reached 280,000 signatures, prompting a response from public officers.

In the case of petitions, the South Korean authorities is required to reply to those who garner over 200,000 signatures inside a month. At one level the general public’s demand for the federal government to steer away from a cryptocurrency ban induced the official presidential “Blue House” web site to briefly go offline, overloaded by guests making an attempt to signal the petition.

In response to the general public outcry, Hong Nam-ki, minister of the workplace for presidency coverage co-ordination, issued a press release:

“The government’s basic rule is to prevent any illegal acts or uncertainties regarding cryptocurrency trade, while eagerly nurturing blockchain technology.”

The public petition arose following South Korean Justice Minister Park Sang-ki’s statements on January 10, claiming the federal government was making ready laws geared toward banning cryptocurrency buying and selling by exchanges. Concerns over this may increasingly have been partially allayed by Finance Minister Kim Dong-yeon, who, within the weeks to comply with, mentioned that the federal government had “no intention to ban or suppress cryptocurrency.”

Hong addressed the contrasting statements between numerous officers: “The government is still divided with many opinions ranging from an outright ban on cryptocurrency trading to bringing the institutions that handle the currency into the system.”

South Korea might also have plans to tax cryptocurrencies, in response to Hong, which means that commerce facilitated from buying and selling might bolster the state treasury. A ban may stifle the prospects of tax income that might end result from buying and selling exercise.

Hong mentioned that after a radical investigation, the federal government will announce what plans it has, if any, to develop and regulate blockchain- and cryptocurrency-based companies.

Jeremy Nation is a author residing in Los Angeles with pursuits in expertise, human rights, and delicacies. He is a full time employees author for ETHNews and holds worth in Ether.

ETHNews is dedicated to its Editorial Policy

Like what you learn? Follow us on Twitter @ETHNews_ to obtain the newest South Korea, cryptocurrency or different Ethereum regulation and laws information.

What do you think?

369 points
Upvote Downvote

Written by Nikolai

Nikolai is a Canadian writer currently living in Singapore. His started writing on Blockchian and bitcoin since 2017, he do Reviews and Analysis on Coins, ICOs. He holds a Master in Business Management and have keen interest in Computer Since, Blockchain and love to write on latest trends in Blockchain space.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *





Token Holders Don’t Give a Damn About Voting Rights and Community Governance

Seven UK Companies Form Cryptocurrency Trade Body